Supervisors wanted to ‘DOGE’ county personnel, but little left to cut without disrupting services to county taxpayers
By Randy Arrington
LURAY, May 11 — As Page County’s nearly 22,000 parcels of property rose an average of 60 percent in value following the recent reassessment, the Board of Supervisors last month also increased the real estate tax assessed on those parcels. While the tax rate dropped from 73 cents (per $100 of assessed value) to 52 cents, that adjustment still represents a tax increase over the “equalization rate” of 48 cents. The increase is projected to generate an additional $1.4 million in real estate tax revenue for the county.
The 48-cent rate on real estate would have left the tax burden about the same on Page County landowners, but supervisors voted following an April 20 public hearing to adopt a higher real estate rate…but a lower tax rate on personal property (i.e, vehicles).
“This was done to partially offset the effective increase in real estate taxes,” said Page County Finance Director Tyler Olsen. “It also puts our [personal property] rate more in line with surrounding counties’ rates.”
While the real estate rate will generate an additional $1.4 million — excluding additional revenue from new construction — lowering the personal property tax rate from $4.30 (per $100 of assessed value) to $3.80 will reduce the county’s tax revenue by about $1 million. Therefore, says Olsen, the net revenue increase between the two tax rates is about $400,000.
Supervisors did approve tax rates lower than what was advertised to the public prior to the April 20 public hearing. Real estate was advertised at 54 cents, while personal property was advertised at $3.90. All other tax rates remain the same as the current fiscal year — machinery and tools ($1.50), motor carrier ($1.50) and aircraft ($0.50). There was also no change to the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT, also known as the “lodging tax”), which was raised to 10 percent on sales two years ago.
Last week, the supervisors unanimously adopted an overall FY27 budget totaling nearly $98 million — an increase of about $5.7 million (about 6 percent) over the FY26 adopted budget of $92.2 million. However, with amendments for incoming grants and additional funding sources throughout the year, the current adjusted budget (ending June 30) is $97.2 million. The new budget takes effect on July 1.
“A significant portion of the increase is due to additional state funding for the school division,” Olsen noted.
Prior to the April 20 public hearing, the county advertised a total budget of just under $100 million. However, that higher amount included additional revenue that would have been generated if the higher tax rates has been adopted as advertised.
“We made numerous cuts, denied multiple requests, and are using over $200,000 of our savings to balance the budget for FY 2027,” Olsen told PVN.
The biggest increase on the revenue side of the county budget can be seen in the school division through an additional $3.4 million in state revenue from Richmond. The General Fund’s real estate tax revenue is projected to grow by a total of nearly $1.7 million — offset partially by the estimated $1 million loss in personal property tax revenue.
The biggest expenditure increase is represented in the $1.1 million of additional local funds earmarked for the local school division. The increased spending is primarily aimed at delivering salary increases, meeting rising costs for health insurance, and preventing a deficit like what was experienced during the current fiscal cycle ending June 30.
“I want to clarify that the school division’s current budget deficit was not caused by their current administration,” Olsen stated. “The current superintendent and CFO have worked diligently to minimize the additional funding they’ll need for the rest of FY 2026.”
On May 4, Supervisors unanimously approved a total school budget of $48.9 million — nearly 50 percent of the total county budget. While a significant portion of that amount is funded by the state, local contributions to schools totaled $13.6 million, an increase of more than $1 million over the current fiscal year. Last year’s adopted school budget was $44.4 million; however the adjusted current budget is $46.6 million.
“The adjusted amount will likely be higher after June, when the school division requests funds to fix their budget deficit,” Olsen said last week.
The adopted local contribution to the school division in FY26 was $12.5 million, and this has been adjusted to nearly $13 million for capital projects and long-term planning studies.
The total spending for the Page County Sheriff’s Office will actually go down in FY27 — from $10.4 million in FY26, to $10.2 million adopted last week.
“Although this appears as a decrease, it’s important to understand that inmate housing costs were inflated during the pandemic,” Olsen explained. “Throughout the past few years, we’ve been significantly reducing that budget line as costs have come back down.”
One of the biggest issues, according to Olsen, debated during the budget deliberations over the past few months “was how we should ‘DOGE’ our government even though our County Administrator made drastic cuts years ago before DOGE was ever a thing.”
“As stated during the work sessions, additional cuts will end or disrupt services,” Olsen told PVN. “This is why we pulled $200,000 from savings to balance the budget. There’s not any fat left to trim, especially for departments overseen by the County Administrator.”
To see a more detailed breakdown of Page County’s FY27 budget,
•••
RELATED ARTICLES
Reassessment reveals more than 50 percent increase in values of most Page County homes
Supervisors double TOT rate to 10% and adopt $90.3M budget for FY25
Supervisors approve $86.5M budget while waiting on state, teachers may still get 7% raise
$70M county budget includes 5% raises for school, county employees



Can someone tell me if the economic development and tourism departments deliver ROI. Do these groups produce the revenue they should? I don’t see it.
Staff needs to deliver. These groups do not. A careful reassessment is needed
The BOS needs to demand results from staff, particularly the economic development group. What have they done to improve housing, business development, and bring revenue to the county? Not much that I can see
The BOS needs to really look at departments like economic development and tourism. Staff and salaries—but do they generate the revenue they should? I don’t see that they do. Get staff in there that can figure how to get natural gas and other infrastructure that we need.
You can have all the economic development offices and staff you fantasize about, but it’s the individual property and business owners who take the risks and make the plans using their initiative that gets what you’re looking for. Stop looking for the government to do everything. It’s somebody else’s job.
This county is as red as it can be, and still taxes keep rising.
We have the worst of both worlds. High taxes and low services.
“High taxes, low services” is a communist agitator example that the left fans out across the country.
It’s weird you would love high taxes without getting much in return. How about we just have low taxes and let individual people figure out how to spend their money.
What “services” do you perceive are lacking? Just in Page County, not from the Chinese troll farm you work for. Low taxes would mean even lower services.
Needing $35 million dollars in hand-outs from Richmond and NOVA to fund our schools sounds pretty “Communist” to me.
And now they want to build a recreation center at the cost to the taxpayer to build, maintain and operate and have the same problem we faced during the building of the new schools is where do you build it so all citizens can logistically utilize its services?. In recent decades we built 2 new schools which I approve of and previous supervisors signed a landfill deal that is still costing us as tax payers and took on a volunteer rescue squad system that was operating very good at almost no cost to the taxpayer and other services the county has implemented big city ideas to a very small tax base with a average income of $27000 so what is next ? If they keep raising taxes to pay for these grand miscalculations eventually it becomes unaffordable for people to live here and exit the county as outsiders move in and create a unsustainable housing market and services the average salary cannot afford and essentially drive out the younger and generational residents of page county.